Investigating the Effects of Charge Arrangement in Stimuli-Responsive Polyelectrolytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The transition from self-coacervation to complex coacervation of a series of charge-balanced polyampholyte (PA) and polyelectrolyte (PE) pairs based on the copolymers of methacrylic acid and N-(3-aminopropyl) methacrylamide hydrochloride is described, with focus on the effects of charge distribution on coacervate properties. Turbidimetric pH titration was used to compare the response of different charge-balanced coacervates to changes in pH. At high molecular weight, resistance to stimuli such as ionic strength and pH increased from the liquid self-coacervate formed from the stoichiometric PA, through complex coacervates formed from complementary nonstoichiometric PAs, to less hydrated coacervates or precipitates formed from two PE homopolymers. In addition, optical microscopy was used to map the compositional regions as a function of ionic strength corresponding to liquid–liquid phase separation by both self- and complex coacervation and liquid–solid phase separation or precipitation. Coacervates were thermally responsive and showed lower critical solution temperatures that were sensitive to composition and ionic strength. Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) was used to explore the energetics of complexation for select complex coacervates, confirming that complexation is dominated by an entropic contribution. Coacervate droplets were shown to reversibly bind ionic dyes and thus have potential use as drug release systems. The coacervate droplets also reacted with genipin to form cross-linked coacervate microgels. The synthetic coacervates used here are easily accessible by free-radical copolymerization and can serve as model systems for phase separation of natural polyampholytes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".