Anatomophysiology of the Henle's Loop: Emphasis on the Thick Ascending Limb
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The loop of Henle plays a variety of important physiological roles through the concerted actions of ion transport systems in both its apical and basolateral membranes. It is involved most notably in extracellular fluid volume and blood pressure regulation as well as Ca2+, Mg2+, and acid-base homeostasis because of its ability to reclaim a large fraction of the ultrafiltered solute load. This nephron segment is also involved in urinary concentration by energizing several of the steps that are required to generate a gradient of increasing osmolality from cortex to medulla. Another important role of the loop of Henle is to sustain a process known as tubuloglomerular feedback through the presence of specialized renal tubular cells that lie next to the juxtaglomerular arterioles. This article aims at describing these physiological roles and at discussing a number of the molecular mechanisms involved. It will also report on novel findings and uncertainties regarding the realization of certain processes and on the pathophysiological consequences of perturbed salt handling by the thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle. Since its discovery 150 years ago, the loop of Henle has remained in the spotlight and is now generating further interest because of its role in the renal-sparing effect of SGLT2 inhibitors. © 2022 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 12:1-21, 2022.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".