Pilot Intervention Targeting Sugary Drink Intake Associated With Improvements in Adolescent Sleep Duration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To examine temporal associations between participation in a community-based intervention targeting sugary drink intake and sleep outcomes among children. Methods Data are from an ethnically diverse sample of 100 children aged 9–12 years from 2 Massachusetts Boys and Girls Club (BGC) sites who participated in a pilot-site randomized trial (usual BGC programming plus H 2 GO! intervention vs usual BGC programming). Secondary outcomes of the trial (sleep duration and adequate sleep duration [≥ 9 h/night] were assessed via a self-report survey at baseline, 2 months, and 6 months. Generalized linear and logistic regression models estimated intervention effects associated with outcomes. Results The intervention was associated with increased sleep duration (β = 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.03–1.45) and higher odds of adequate sleep (odds ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–5.74) at 2 months. Sleep did not differ by treatment condition at 6 months. Conclusions and Implications This community-based sugary drink intake intervention may be a potential avenue to improve child sleep outcomes in the short term.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".