MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200121057 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.104.065803

Mass measurements of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Ga</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>60</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn>63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math> reduce x-ray burst model uncertainties and extend the evaluated <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> isobaric multiplet mass equation

2021· article· lv· W4200121057 on OpenAlexafffund
S. F. Paul, J. Bergmann, J. D. Cardona, K. Dietrich, E. Dunling, Z. Hockenbery, C. Hornung, C. Izzo, Andrew Jacobs, A. Javaji, B. Kootte, Y. Lan, E. Leistenschneider, E. M. Lykiardopoulou, Ish Mukul, T. Murböck, W. S. Porter, R. Silwal, M. B. Smith, Jon Ringuette, T. Brunner, T. Dickel, I. Dillmann, G. Gwinner, M. MacCormick, M. P. Reiter, H. Schatz, N. A. Smirnova, J. Dilling, A. A. Kwiatkowski

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2021
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill UniversityUniversity of ManitobaTRIUMF
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of ScienceCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCanada Foundation for InnovationNational Science FoundationTRIUMFU.S. Department of EnergyJoint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics - Center for the Evolution of the ElementsDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUK Research and Innovation
KeywordsComputer scienceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report precision mass measurements of neutron-deficient gallium isotopes approaching the proton drip line. The measurements of $^{60\text{--}63}\mathrm{Ga}$ performed with the TITAN multiple-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer provide a more than threefold improvement over the current literature mass uncertainty of $^{61}\mathrm{Ga}$ and mark the first direct mass measurement of $^{60}\mathrm{Ga}$. The improved precision of the $^{61}\mathrm{Ga}$ mass has important implications for the astrophysical $rp$ process, as it constrains essential reaction $Q$ values near the $^{60}\mathrm{Zn}$ waiting point. Based on calculations with a one-zone model, we demonstrate the impact of the improved mass data on prediction uncertainties of x-ray burst models. The first-time measurement of the $^{60}\mathrm{Ga}$ ground-state mass establishes the proton-bound nature of this nuclide, thus constraining the location of the proton drip line along this isotopic chain. Including the measured mass of $^{60}\mathrm{Ga}$ further enables us to extend the evaluated $T=1$ isobaric multiplet mass equation up to $A=60$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207