EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PROFILE AND CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES IN A BRAZILIAN REFERRAL CENTER
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The increase in the incidence and prevalence rates of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is evident in many newly industrialized countries in Asia, Africa, Eastern Europe, and the American continent. In Brazil, records are still scarce, and further studies on this topic are needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the epidemiological profile and clinical characteristics of patients with IBD who were followed up at a reference service in the state of São Paulo. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients with IBD who were followed up in a Brazilian Referral Center. RESULTS: A total of 625 patients was evaluated, 416 with Crohn's disease (CD), 190 with ulcerative colitis (UC), and 19 with indeterminate colitis. The average age of the patients was 31.6 years, with a homogeneous distribution between males and females patients. In patients with CD, the most predominant Montreal classification was A2, L3, and B1, with 44.8% of patients presenting with perianal disease; in UC, it was E2, and S0. The main extraintestinal manifestation was rheumatologic, followed by cutaneous and ophthalmic lesions. The majority of patients (85.4%) used some type of medication, the most frequent being aminosalicylates in patients with UC and biological therapy in patients with CD. Regarding surgeries, in CD, a significant percentage of patients underwent some type of surgical procedure, unlike the UC patients, including fistulotomies and placement of seton, derivative ostomies, enterectomy, ileocecectomy/right colectomy, total or partial colectomy, and strictureplasty. Only 195 (31.2%) patients lived in the city of Campinas, while 443 (70.9%) were from the 7th Regional Health Department (RHD), which corresponds to the macro-region of Campinas. CONCLUSION: In this study, most patients came from the 7th RHD of Campinas; the patients were young, with no predominance of either sex; there was a higher frequency of patients with CD (66.6%). Most of them (85.4%) were undergoing pharmacological treatment, and a significant percentage of CD patients had undergone surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".