The effects of post-cumulus alteration on the distribution of chalcophile elements in magmatic sulfide deposits and implications for the formation of low-S-high-PGE zones: The Luanga deposit, Carajás Mineral Province, Brazil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Most of the World's platinum-group element ore deposits occur as thin stratiform layers within layered intrusions. These layers generally contain disseminated base-metal sulfides or chromite. However, cryptic platinum-group element deposits also occur without chromite or base-metal sulfides in what are known as low-S-high platinum-group element deposits. The origin of these deposits is not clearly understood. The Luanga Complex hosts the largest platinum-group elements resource in South America (i.e., 142 Mt at 1.24 ppm Pt + Pd + Au and 0.11% Ni) and hosts both a platinum-group element deposit containing disseminated base-metal sulfides (style 1) and a low-S-high platinum-group element deposit (style 2). It therefore offers the opportunity to compare the two deposit types in the same overall geological setting and consider how the low-S-high platinum-group element deposit could have formed. The first deposit style is termed the Sulfide zone and consists of a 10–50 meter-thick interval with disseminated base metal sulfides, whereas the second style is named low-S-high-Pt-Pd zone and consists of 2–10 meter-thick discontinuous lenses of 1–5 meter-thick sulfide- and oxide-free harzburgite and orthopyroxenite with discrete platinum-group minerals. Secondary assemblages commonly replace primary igneous minerals to a variable extent throughout the deposit, and thus allow for investigating the effects of post-cumulus alteration on the distribution of a wide range of chalcophile elements in a magmatic sulfide deposit at both whole-rock and mineral scale. This study presents the whole-rock distribution of S, platinum-group elements, and Te, As, Bi, Sb, and Se in both mineralization styles and the concentration of trace elements in base-metal sulfides from the Sulfide zone. The Sulfide zone has Pt/Pd ratios around 0.5 and high concentrations of Te, As, Bi, Sb, and Se, whereas the low-S-high-platinum-group element zone has Pt/Pd ratios greater than 1 and much lower Se, Te, and Bi concentrations, but comparable As and Sb contents. This is reflected in the platinum-group element assemblage, comprising bismuthotellurides in the Sulfide zone and mostly arsenides and antimonides in the low-S, high platinum-group elements zone. Moreover, the base-metal sulfides from the Sulfide zone have anomalously high As contents (50–500 ppm), which suggest that the sulfide liquid segregated from a very As-rich silicate magma, possibly illustrated by an average komatiitic basalt that assimilated a mixture of upper continental crust and black shales. We interpret the low-S-high platinum-group elements zone as a product of S loss from magmatic sulfides during post-cumulus alteration of the Luanga Complex. Selenium, Te, Bi, and Pd were also lost together with S, whereas As and Sb were expelled from base-metal sulfide structures and combined with platinum-group elements to form platinum-group minerals, suggesting they may play a role fixating platinum-group elements during alteration. The remobilization of chalcophile elements from magmatic sulfide deposits located in the Carajás Mineral Province may represent a potential source for hydrothermal deposits found in the region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".