MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200137798 · doi:10.1109/tap.2021.3137499

The MTM-EBG as a Rigorous Multiconductor Model of the UC-EBG and Approaches for Miniaturization

2021· article· en· W4200137798 on OpenAlexafffund
Stuart Barth, Ashwin K. Iyer

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMetamaterialMiniaturizationEquivalent circuitHFSSMicrostripTransmission linePrinted circuit boardElectronic engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)Materials scienceAcousticsComputer scienceOptoelectronicsPhysicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsMicrostrip antennaAntenna (radio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A multiconductor transmission-line (MTL) model is proposed with which to model the uniplanar compact electromagnetic bandgap structure (UC-EBG). The model is based on a 2-D arrangement of metamaterial-based electromagnetic bandgap structures (MTM-EBGs), with a central node region. The branches of this structure are modeled as conductor-backed coplanar waveguide segments with integrated series capacitors, while the node region is modeled as a grid of microstrip (MS) lines with suitably augmented propagation velocities. The dispersion properties of the canonical UC-EBG unit cell are simulated in Ansys HFSS and compared with those of an equivalent simulation model based on a 2-D arrangement of weakly loaded MTM-EBGs, as well as similar data produced by the MTL equivalent-circuit model, which are all found to be in agreement. It is then shown that additional capacitive loading allows for substantial miniaturization, a regime in which even better agreement is produced between the equivalent circuit model’s dispersion data and the data produced by an equivalent HFSS model. Using these data, the Bloch modes of this structure are analyzed in detail. Thus, the MTL perspective offers a recipe for producing highly miniaturized UC-EBG unit cells that may be successfully integrated into printed circuit board (PCB) systems for applications in parallel-plate noise and surface-wave (SW) mode suppression, among others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score0.264

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207