Prevalence of occult nodal metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the temporal bone: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives : Primary : To determine the rate of occult cervical metastasis in primary temporal bone squamous cell carcinomas (TBSSC). Secondary : to perform a subgroup meta-analysis of the risk of occult metastasis based on the clinical stage of the tumour and its risk based on corresponding levels of the neck Design : A systematic review and meta-analysis of papers searched through Medline, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science up to January 2021 to determine the pooled rate of occult lymph node/parotid metastases. Quality assessment of the included studies was assessed through the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Setting : Centres around the world that perform surgery for TBSCC Participants : Patients with TBSCC Results : Overall, 9 out of 1034 screened studies met the inclusion criteria, for a total of 907 patients of which 388 had TBSCC. Out of the 191 patients who underwent a neck dissection, 21 had positive lymph nodes giving a pooled rate of occult metastases of 11% (95% CI: 7%-17%). When analysed using the Modified Pittsburg staging system, 21 pT2 cases had a pooled occult metastases rate of 3% (95% CI: 0%-21%), 27 pT3 cases had a pooled occult metastases rate of 12% (95% CI: 1%-60%), and 65 pT4 cases had a pooled occult metastases rate of 14% (95% CI: 7%-25%). Data available showed that most of the positive nodes were in Level II. Conclusion: The rate of occult cervical metastases in TBSCC increases based on the tumour (T) staging of the disease with majority of nodal disease found in level 2 of the neck.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.014 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".