Phenomenon of Demikhov. At N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute (1960–1986). V.P. Demikhov and world transplantology in 1968-1969
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article has reviewed the advances of Soviet and world Transplantology in the field of heart and other organ transplantation achieved by the end of the 1960s. It is shown that there were several groups of doctors and scientists who worked in the USSR dealing with the problem of experimental organ transplantation and trying to bring this experience into clinic. The group of surgeons and urologists (B.V. Petrovsky, Y.M. Lopukhin, etc.) from the Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Surgery and the 2nd MOLGMI named after N.I. Pirogov, which had the greatest administrative resources and technical capabilities, was successfully implementing kidney transplantation into clinic. The staff of the Faculty Surgery Department (V.S. Savelyev and others) of the 2nd MOLGMI named after N.I. Pirogov developed experimental approaches to heart and liver transplantation. Surgeons from the Tuberculosis Research Institute (N.I. Gerasimenko and others) were dealing with in lung auto- and homotransplats in experiment. All those studies were conducted in close contact with the Department of Operative Surgery and Topographic Anatomy of the 2nd MOLGMI named after N.I. Pirogov (G.E. Ostroverkhov) and the Research Laboratory for Organ Transplantation established at that Department (Y.M. Lopukhin). The leading position in heart transplantation in the country belonged to the Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery (A.A. Vishnevsky, etc.). Surgeons of the MMA named after S.M. Kirov (I.S. Kolesnikov, etc.) rendered a great assistance to the Institute. Apart from these institutions, the Organ Transplantation Laboratory (headed by V.P. Demikhov) worked at N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine; it had gained a huge experimental experience, but had very modest opportunities to purchase equipment and pharmaceuticals, to conduct laboratory and morphological studies, having practically no prospects for introducing the results of its research into clinic. Meanwhile, the world clinical Transplantation continued to develop successfully, which was reflected in the materials of the 2nd International Symposium on Heart Transplantation held in 1969 in Montreal (Canada).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".