MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200153366 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1512

1320. In Vitro Activity of Lefamulin against <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Isolated from the Lower Respiratory Tract of Children with Cystic Fibrosis

2021· article· en· W4200153366 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hélio S. Sader, Susanne Paukner, Steven P Gelone, S J Ryan Arends, Rodrigo E. Mendes

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary medicine and infectious diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStaphylococcus aureusBroth microdilutionMedicineMicrobiologyRespiratory tract infectionsAzithromycinAntimicrobialAntibioticsMinimum inhibitory concentrationRespiratory systemInternal medicineBacteriaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Lefamulin is a first-in-class, oral and IV pleuromutilin antibiotic approved in the US, EU, and Canada for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) in adults. Lefamulin inhibits bacterial protein synthesis via a unique mechanism of action and its potency against S. aureus has been well established. We evaluated the in vitro activity of lefamulin against S. aureus from patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Methods Unique isolates (n=224) were collected from the lower respiratory tract (LRT) of children (≤17 years old) with CF and LRT infection. Organisms were from qualified respiratory specimens and determined to be the probable cause of infection by the participant center. The isolates were collected in 2018-2020 from 22 medical centers in 11 countries and tested by broth microdilution methods at JMI Laboratories. Most isolates were from the US (43.3%), Spain (24.1%), France (20.5%), and Costa Rica (7.1%). Results Lefamulin was highly active against the CF S. aureus collection (MIC5090, 0.06/0.12 mg/L), with 99.6% of isolates inhibited at ≤0.25 mg/L, consistent with the susceptible [S] breakpoint published by the US FDA, CLSI, and EUCAST. Only 1 lefamulin-non-S (MIC, 1 mg/L) isolate was observed, a methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) collected in Costa Rica in 2018 and carrying a vga(A) gene. Lefamulin retained potent activity against methicillin-resistant (R) S. aureus (MRSA, n=52; MIC50/90, 0.06/0.12 mg/L), azithromycin-R (n=115; MIC50/90, 0.06/0.12 mg/L), levofloxacin-R (n=23; MIC50/90, 0.06/0.12 mg/L), clindamycin-R (n=11; MIC50/90, 0.06/0.12 mg/L), and gentamicin-R (n=9; MIC range of 0.03-0.12 mg/L) isolates as well as those isolates with multiple resistance phenotypes. Against MRSA, susceptibility to azithromycin was 23.5% and to levofloxacin 64.7%. All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, linezolid and ceftaroline (Table). Among isolates from the US (n=97), the MRSA rate was 30.9% and all isolates were Lefamulin-S (MIC5090, 0.06/0.12 mg/L). Conclusion Lefamulin demonstrated potent in vitro antibacterial activity against S. aureus from children with CF, regardless of resistance phenotype. Lefamulin may represent a valuable treatment option for CF patients with S. aureus LRT infections. Disclosures Helio S. Sader, MD, PhD, FIDSA, AbbVie (formerly Allergan) (Research Grant or Support)Basilea Pharmaceutica International, Ltd. (Research Grant or Support)Cipla Therapeutics (Research Grant or Support)Cipla USA Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Department of Health and Human Services (Research Grant or Support, Contract no. HHSO100201600002C)Melinta Therapeutics, LLC (Research Grant or Support)Nabriva Therapeutics (Research Grant or Support)Pfizer, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Shionogi (Research Grant or Support)Spero Therapeutics (Research Grant or Support) Susanne Paukner, PhD, Nabriva Therapeutics GmbH (Employee) Steven P. Gelone, PharmD, Nabriva Therapeutics US, Inc. (Employee) S J Ryan Arends, PhD, AbbVie (formerly Allergan) (Research Grant or Support)GlaxoSmithKline, LLC (Research Grant or Support)Melinta Therapeutics, LLC (Research Grant or Support)Nabriva Therapeutics (Research Grant or Support)Spero Therapeutics (Research Grant or Support) Rodrigo E. Mendes, PhD, AbbVie (Research Grant or Support)AbbVie (formerly Allergan) (Research Grant or Support)Cipla Therapeutics (Research Grant or Support)Cipla USA Inc. (Research Grant or Support)ContraFect Corporation (Research Grant or Support)GlaxoSmithKline, LLC (Research Grant or Support)Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Melinta Therapeutics, LLC (Research Grant or Support)Nabriva Therapeutics (Research Grant or Support)Pfizer, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Shionogi (Research Grant or Support)Spero Therapeutics (Research Grant or Support)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicVeterinary medicine and infectious diseasesFrench-language works237,207