MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200153472 · doi:10.1002/cta.3203

An ultra‐low power and low jitter frequency synthesizer for 5G wireless communication and IoE applications

2021· article· en· W4200153472 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Bagheri, Xun Li

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrequency synthesizerPhase-locked loopPhase noiseVoltage-controlled oscillatorJitterFrequency dividerElectrical engineeringComputer scienceElectronic engineeringCMOSDirect digital synthesizerEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents a fully integrated analog phase‐locked loop (PLL) fractional‐ N frequency synthesizer for 5G wireless communication and Internet‐of‐Everything (IoE) applications. To demonstrate the effectiveness of this frequency synthesizer, we apply it to three wireless communication standards. Contrary to using Verilog or VHDL to implement the programmable frequency divider, we propose a new approach in the transistor level with a new divide‐by‐2/3 circuit, dynamic asynchronous resettable D and JK flip‐flops, and the OR & AND gates to customize the divider for low‐power, low‐jitter, and fast‐lock time applications. In addition, we have designed a new frequency phase detector (PFD) to overcome the dead region issue. An ultra‐low phase noise and low‐power voltage control oscillator (VCO) is exploited from our previous work with the flicker noise corner frequency around 10 kHz to achieve the lowest possible phase noise. The implementation is done in 180‐nm standard CMOS technology. It covers two frequency ranges including 2.4 to 2.48 GHz and 5 to 5.825 GHz for these wireless communication standards. According to simulations in the worst case, the lock time, rms‐jitter, in‐band fractional spur, power consumption, and jitter‐power figure‐of‐merit of the frequency synthesizer is 18 μs, 56 fs, −63 dBc, 4 mW, and −259, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Circuit Theory and ApplicationsSame topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207