Effect of Accelerated Cooling on Linepipe Steel Mill Scale and Resulting Localized Corrosion Susceptibility
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The structure and composition of mill scale on linepipe steel formed with and without accelerated cooling conditions (ACC) was investigated and correlated to localized corrosion susceptibility. The mill scale structure/composition was investigated using scanning electron microscopy equipped with x-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy and electron backscatter diffraction, as well as x-ray diffraction. Localized dissolution of the mill scale was investigated using electrochemical techniques including open-circuit potential measurements, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and electrochemical noise measurements in a corrosive phase solution. The various surface analytical and electrochemical techniques indicated that the mill scale formed without ACC consists of a relatively crack-free, thick inner wüstite layer with a thinner magnetite outer layer. However, the mill scale formed with ACC comprised a magnetite layer containing islands of retained wüstite, with some evidence of magnetite/iron eutectoid formation and which exhibited a relatively high density of through-scale cracks. These cracks can provide direct paths that connect the corrosive solution to the steel substrate, leading to a more rapid breakdown of the mill scale. Additionally, the cracks can form a crevice between the mill scale and the steel surface, providing sites for pit initiation and growth. Coefficient of thermal expansion mismatch thermal stress calculations indicate that a magnetite-based scale is more susceptible to cracking/spalling than a wüstite-based scale, resulting in the ACC plate being more susceptible to localized corrosion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".