10. Impact of Infectious Disease Consultation and Theoretical Management Bundle in Patients with Candidemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Candidemia is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The impact of infectious diseases consultation (IDC) on clinical outcomes in patients with candidemia is not well established. We evaluated the impact of IDC and a management bundle on clinical outcomes in patients with candidemia. Methods A retrospective chart review of adult (age ≥ 18 years) patients with at least 1 blood culture growing Candida species identified at Alberta Precision Laboratories between December 1, 2019 to November 30, 2020 and hospitalized at the University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Canada were included. Patients who died within 48 hours and those who left against medical advice within 24 hours of initial positive blood culture result were excluded. Demographics, management, and outcome data were collected. A complete management bundle was defined as having all the following elements performed: IDC, repeat blood cultures, empiric echinocandin therapy, ophthalmology consult, and echocardiogram. Results Thirty-one patients were included for study; mean age was 56 ± 17 years and 65% were male. 14 (45%) cases were admitted under critical care, 7 (23%) surgery, and 10 (32%) medicine. 3/17 (18%) required intensive care unit admission following candidemia diagnosis. Candida albicans was identified in more than half the cases. The primary source was intra-abdominal in 12 (39%), central-line associated in 8 (26%), and urinary in 6 (19%). IDC occurred in 27 cases (87%), echocardiogram in 22 (71%), ophthalmology consult in 10 (32%), and follow-up blood cultures in 30 (97%). 20 (65%) patients received empiric echinocandin. Of the remainder who received empiric fluconazole, 4 (36%) grew non albicans Candida species. Higher in-hospital mortality was observed in cases without IDC than those with IDC (4/4, 100% vs 8/27, 29.6%, p=0.016) and in those that did not have a complete bundle (12/25, 48% vs 0/6, p=0.059). However, IDC was not associated with the receipt of individual bundle components nor the complete bundle (p=NS). Conclusion In patients with candidemia, lower in-hospital mortality was observed in patients who received IDC. Larger studies are required to confirm our findings and assess whether the implementation of a candidemia management bundle is beneficial. Disclosures Dima Kabbani, MD, AVIR Pharma (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Speaker)Edesa Biotech (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Scientific Research Study Investigator)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".