MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200167584 · doi:10.1676/21-00023

Interspecific parental care by a European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris) at the nest of a Hairy Woodpecker (Dryobates villosus)

2021· article· en· W4200167584 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dominic Janus, Elizabeth A. Gow

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Wilson Journal of Ornithology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphBirds CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSturnusStarlingWoodpeckerNest (protein structural motif)Interspecific competitionBiologyEcologyZoologyCompetition (biology)Habitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris) is a cavity-nesting species that aggressively competes with other cavity nesters, such as woodpeckers, and usurps their nest cavities. Interspecific parental care among birds is uncommon and scarcely reported for European Starlings and woodpeckers. Here, we report an observation of a clutch of 3 Hairy Woodpecker (Dryobates villosus) nestlings being fed by both an adult female Hairy Woodpecker and at least 1 adult European Starling in southern Ontario, Canada. There are differences in parental behavior observed between the starling and female Hairy Woodpecker, namely only the starling entered the cavity (7.0 times/h) and removed fecal sacs (4.2 times/h) while the female Hairy Woodpecker never showed these behaviors during our observation period, but she fed nestlings 7.4 times/h compared to 4.9 times/h by the starling. Although proximate causes of this behavior are unclear, nest site competition, overlap of the timing of breeding and preferred habitat, or the loss of the male woodpecker may have triggered this behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Wilson Journal of OrnithologySame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207