Fast volumetric imaging with line-scan confocal microscopy by an electro-tunable lens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In microscopic imaging of biological tissues, particularly real-time visualization of neuronal activities, rapid acquisition of volumetric images poses a prominent challenge. Typically, two-dimensional (2D) microscopy can be devised into an imaging system with 3D capability using any varifocal lens. Despite the conceptual simplicity, such an upgrade yet requires additional, complicated device components and suffers a reduced acquisition rate, which is critical to document neuronal dynamics properly. In this study, we implemented an electro-tunable lens (ETL) in the line-scan confocal microscopy, enabling the volumetric acquisition at the rate of 20 frames per second with the maximum volume of interest of 315 × 315 × 80 μm 3 . The axial extent of point-spread-function (PSF) was 17.6 ± 1.6 μm and 90.4 ± 2.1 μm with the ETL operating in either stationary or resonant mode, respectively, revealing significant depth elongation by the resonant mode ETL microscopy. We further demonstrated the utilities of the ETL system by volume imaging of cleared mouse brain ex vivo samples and in vivo brains. The current study foregrounds the successful application of resonant ETL for constructing a basis for a high-performance 3D line-scan confocal microscopy system, which will enhance our understanding of various dynamic biological processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".