Methacrylate and Styrene Block Copolymer Synthesis by Cu‐Mediated Chain Extension of Acrylate Macroinitiator in a Semibatch Reactor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A process for the well‐controlled growth of acrylates by Cu‐mediated polymerization has been developed, with macroinitiator synthesized continuously in a copper tubular reactor and subsequently chain‐extended in a semibatch reactor without additional copper. Extending this process to methacrylates and styrene, however, has proven difficult due to a significant reduction in reaction rate. This barrier has been overcome by chain‐extending the low molecular weight ( M n of 760 g mol –1 ) poly(methyl acrylate) macroinitiator with methacrylates and styrene using PMDETA ( N , N , N ′, N ″, N ″‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine) as ligand. Methyl methacrylate conversions of >80% at 70 °C and diethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate conversions of >90% at room temperature are achieved in 4 h, with the same room temperature conditions successfully applied for controlled chain extensions with butyl methacrylate. Although styrene conversions are slightly lower (60–70%) over 4 h at 85 °C, the rates achieved are substantially higher than achieved in other studies. Hydrophobic–hydrophilic triblock structures are produced through sequential monomer feeds to the semibatch reactor, keeping total reaction time to less than 5 h. The ability to incorporate methacrylates and/or styrene into structured block polymers greatly extends the range of products that can be efficiently synthesized with low copper levels by this process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".