MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200201854 · doi:10.1002/rra.3912

Cumulative downstream turbine‐induced mortality and thresholds for facilitating upstream passage of American eel

2021· article· en· W4200201854 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Tim Haxton

Bibliographic record

VenueRiver Research and Applications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Natural Resources and Forestry
FundersGovernment of OntarioOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry
KeywordsHydroelectricityPopulationEnvironmental scienceCumulative effectsTurbineHabitatUpstream (networking)Mortality rateGeographyFisheryEcologyDemographyBiologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract American eels ( Anguilla rostrata ) are vulnerable to turbine‐induced mortality during outmigration along regulated rivers. Turbine‐induced mortality is cumulative when multiple facilities are encountered along the route. This level of mortality may be unsustainable such that facilitating upstream movement ostensibly for recovery purposes, may in fact be detrimental to the population or an ecological trap. The objectives of this study were to estimate a theoretical threshold for facilitating upstream movement passed hydroelectric facilities and estimating cumulative turbine mortality within waterbodies across American eel's historical range within Ontario, Canada. A stage‐structured model was used to estimate mortality thresholds parameterized by published life stage survival probabilities using a maternal effect and altering silver eel survival to mimic turbine mortality. The threshold was exceeded when population growth (λ) declined below 1.0. Site mortality was estimated based on the generating station characteristics including turbine type, size, proportion of flow through turbines, and sluice gate height. Cumulative mortality within a waterbody was projected using a Bayesian network (i.e., conditional probability) and the calculated site‐specific mortality. The survival required for a stable population using the stage‐structured model was 0.75; (0.65–0.85) therefore, annual mortality greater than 0.25 (0.15–0.35) would result in population decline (λ < 1). The effects of turbine mortality increased with additional hydroelectric facilities encountered along the route. Across Ontario, there was no eel habitat deemed to be safe in terms of levels of cumulative turbine mortality during outmigration. Moreover, 89.1% of eel habitat was considered to be within the cautionary range of turbine mortality, whereas 10.9% of eel habitat was considered to be above the threshold for sustainable passage during outmigration. Lake Ontario accounted for 98.2% of the area within the cautionary range, whereas most of the tributaries and watersheds associated with the Ottawa River and Lake Ontario were above the threshold.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRiver Research and ApplicationsSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207