MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 11597: Characterization of Epinephrine Use During Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

2021· article· en· W4200207473 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas Kucher, Alexandra Marquez, Anne Marie Guerguerian, Michael-Alice Moga, Mariella Vargas-Gutierrez, Mark Todd, Osami Honjo, Christoph Haller, Geraldine Goco, Alejandro A. Floh

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationCardiopulmonary resuscitationAfterloadAnesthesiaResuscitationCardiogenic shockInotropeExtracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitationRetrospective cohort studyCardiologyInternal medicineHemodynamicsMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Guidelines recommend dosing Epinephrine (Epi) at regular intervals during pediatric cardiac arrest, including patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The impact of Epi-induced vasoconstriction on systemic afterload and veno-arterial ECMO support is poorly understood. Hypothesis: Higher total dose of Epi and shorter interval between Epi dose and ECMO flow during cardiac arrest will increase systemic afterload and interfere with ECMO support. Methods: This is an ancillary study to a single-center, retrospective observational study of patients 0-18 years old who required ECMO cannulation during resuscitation over a six-year period. Patients were excluded if ECMO was initiated prior to arrest or if the resuscitation record was incomplete. The primary exposure was time from last dose of Epi to initiation of ECMO flows; secondary exposures included cumulative Epi dose delivered and indexed to arrest time. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and systemic vasodilator therapy were used as surrogates for systemic afterload; ECMO pump speed and vasoactive-inotrope score (VIS) were used as measures of ECMO support. Results: A total 92 events in 87 patients analyzed. The patient cohort was 53% female with median (IQR) age of 122 (30-478) days, weight 4.4 (3.3 - 8.7) kg, and 43% single ventricle physiology. On average, Epi was given 7 (4 - 10) times during a 35 (27 - 44) min arrest, for a total dose of 65 (37 - 101) mcg/kg; the last dose was given 6 (2 -16) min prior to the initiation of ECMO flows. In the 6 hours following initiation of ECMO, MAP increased from 42 (36 - 56) mmHg to 57 (47 - 70) mmHg, (p<0.0001). Shorter interval between last Epi dose and ECMO initiation trended with higher MAP after 1 hour of support (estimate -0.43, p=0.06) and associated with increased of vasodilators within 6 hours of ECMO (vasodilators used (1 - 6) vs not used 9 (3 - 16) min, p=0.05). No other associations were found between Epi delivery, MAP, vasodilator use, pump speed or VIS. Conclusion: There is limited evidence to support that regular dosing of Epi throughout a cardiac arrest is associated with clinically significant increases in afterload after ECMO cannulation. Additional studies are needed to validate findings against ECMO flows and clinically relevant outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→