The adverse cardiovascular risk factor profile of women with pre‐eclampsia develops over time in the years before pregnancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Women with a history of pre-eclampsia have an elevated lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease that may be partly attributed to an adverse cardiovascular risk factor profile, the etiology of which is unclear. Hypothesising that this adverse risk profile may begin to arise over time in the years before pregnancy, we sought to evaluate the pregravid changes over time in cardiovascular risk factors in women who go on to develop pre-eclampsia and those who do not. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using population-based administrative databases. SETTING: Ontario, Canada. POPULATION: All nulliparous women who had singleton pregnancies between January 2011 and December 2018. METHODS: All results for the following analytes between January 2008 and the start of pregnancy were identified: A1c, glucose, lipids, and transaminases. Mean values were compared between those with and without preeclampsia. The annual change for each analyte in the years before pregnancy was estimated using generalized estimating equations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Preeclampsia. RESULTS: The 156 278 women (of whom 3827 developed preeclampsia) had mean 4.0 ± 3.3 pregravid tests overall. The two most recent pregravid tests were performed at median 0.6 and 1.9 years before pregnancy, respectively. Women who developed pre-eclampsia had higher pregravid A1c, fasting glucose, random glucose, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, and ALT, and lower HDL-cholesterol, than their peers (all P < 0.0001). In the years before pregnancy, women who went on to develop pre-eclampsia had higher annual increases than their peers in triglycerides (13.8-fold higher; P = 0.0004) and random glucose (1.55-fold higher; P = 0.001), coupled with a greater annual decrease in HDL-cholesterol (9.7-fold higher; P = 0.002). During this time, fasting glucose increased in women who developed pre-eclampsia but decreased in their peers (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: In women who develop pre-eclampsia, an adverse cardiovascular risk factor profile evolves over time in the years before pregnancy. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: In women who develop pre-eclampsia, an adverse CV risk factor profile evolves in the years before pregnancy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".