The Construction Process of a School: The Antalya Kaleiçi Orthodox Christian Girls’ School (Dumlupınar Secondary School) in Ottoman Archival Documents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Occupied by the Ottomans since the last quarter of the 14th century, Antalya had a demographic structure by which Muslims obtained a quantitative superiority in the period that followed. However, non-Muslim communities contained to maintain a demographic and social presence. These communities, especially the Rums (Greeks), were a significant element of urban society with their living spaces intramuros and in the adjacent hinterland of Antalya. Their social conditions were redefined by the Edict of Gülhane and the Reform Edict. These edicts gave them the right to construct their own public spaces along with other social rights. Accordingly, from the 19th century on, there is a significant rise in the number of public buildings constructed by these communities, especially in the vilayets. The situation is similarly characteristic of Ottoman Antalya. Throughout this study, the construction process of the modern Dumlupınar Secondary School, originally built in the late 19th-early 20th century for female children of Antalya’s Rum community, will be discussed in correlation with Ottoman archival documents. This study contributes to the literature on the Ottoman past of Antalya with its review of the original drawings of its plan and façade, which will be published for the first time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".