MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4200282548 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-781739/v1

‘it Is Beyond Our Reach’: Policies and Infrastructure Influencing Postpartum Care in Rural Kenya

2021· preprint· en· W4200282548 on OpenAlexaff
Janet Kemei, Josephine Etowa

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThematic analysisNursingChildbirthSocioeconomic statusQualitative researchHealth careMedicineMaternity careDeveloping countryEconomic growthBusinessSocioeconomicsEnvironmental healthPopulationPregnancySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BackgroundMaternal mortality in low middle-income countries is still high. Like most countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, the progress towards reducing maternal mortalities in Kenya is slow. Approximately 488 women out of every 100,000 live births die during the childbearing process. Kenya has put in place several strategies to mitigate maternal mortalities. For instance, Kenya introduced free maternity services in 2013 to remove financial barriers to skilled health services for mothers and children under five years old. Hence, it is necessary to explore how the policies and infrastructure intersect with other socioeconomic factors to influence postpartum care in rural Kenya to mitigate maternal and infant deaths.MethodsThis qualitative research conducted in-depth focused ethnographic (FE) interviews with 23 nurses and midwives working in nine health centres and the County Hospital in Nandi County, Kenya, between July 2017 and February 2018. We used thematic analysis approach as described by Braun and Clarke to analyze the data. Lincoln and Guba criteria for establishing the trustworthiness of data was used. ResultsThe analysis of data generated six themes. The findings from the theme, Policies and Infrastructure Influencing Postpartum Care will be discussed in this paper. The findings will be discussed under three sub-themes 1) Free maternity services, 2) Adherence to perinatal care guidelines, and 3) Recruitment and retention of nurses and midwives. Facilities lacked the essential equipment and supplies required to provide these services, recruitment and retention of staff, demotivation of healthcare providers, lack of regular training and supervision of staff, and lack of adherence to postpartum guidelines. These issues intersected to determine the quality of skilled postpartum services provided to childbearing women and their families as well as women and infants’ overall perinatal health outcomes. ConclusionThe findings have underscored the importance of having a functional healthcare system that supports both the clinical and emotional aspects of the women and healthcare providers. Efforts should be directed into addressing the negative factors influencing care provision at the facility level. Suboptimal care could cause women not to attend skilled health care and sabotage the global goals of eliminating maternal and infant mortalities. This can be achieved by creating policies that considers the diverse causes and power-relations withing the healthcare organization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicGlobal Maternal and Child Health→French-language works237,207→