MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200300693 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofab466.616

416. Diagnostic Yield of Serial COVID-19 Testing in Hospitalized Patients

2021· article· en· W4200300693 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jeremy Li, Charles Frenette, Vivian G. Loo

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)GeneXpert MTB/RIFIncidence (geometry)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Diagnostic testPoint-of-care testingInfection controlPediatricsEmergency medicineInternal medicineTuberculosisSurgeryDiseaseImmunologyPathologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)Sputum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Accurate and rapid diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is essential to prevent nosocomial transmission. Patients with negative COVID-19 tests at admission may still be in the incubation phase during hospitalisation. False negative results can occur when patients are tested too early. The incidence of COVID-19 infections in Montréal, Canada started to increase in December 2020. Because of this rise, on January 4th, 2021, the Infection Control Service of the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) recommended serial COVID-19 testing for all admitted patients on days 5 and 10 after admission. The aim of this study is to examine the diagnostic yield of serial COVID-19 testing. Methods We retrospectively analyzed SARS-CoV-2 test results for patients admitted to the MUHC between January 4, 2021, and April 30, 2021. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from patients for SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing. Multiple testing platforms were used (Roche Cobas 6800, Thermo ScientificTM King Fisher and Cepheid GeneXpert) because of the high volume of samples. Tests were classified as admission, day 5, and day 10 tests if they were done on days 0 to 2, 3 to 7, and 8 to 12 respectively. Patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 on admission were excluded from the analyses. The diagnostic yield of serial testing for patients admitted during each month was calculated by dividing the number of patients testing positive on day 5 or day 10 by the total number of patients who underwent serial testing during that month. Results There were 2945 admissions of 5 days or more and 1777 admissions of 10 days or more. Of these, 1509 patients and 841 patients respectively were serially tested for SARS-CoV-2 as recommended for a compliance rate of 51% at day 5 and 47% at day 10. Ten (0.7%) and 12 (1.4%) patients tested positive on days 5 and 10 respectively. The diagnostic yield of serial testing was highest for patients admitted in January 2021 at 2.2%, when the average daily incidence of COVID-19 was highest in Montréal (see Figure). The diagnostic yield of serial testing for each month, compared to the average daily COVID-19 incidence rate in Montréal, Québec, Canada. Conclusion The diagnostic yield of serial SARS-CoV-2 testing in hospitalized patients is low when the overall community incidence is low. However, diagnostic yield of serial testing increases when community incidence of COVID-19 is higher and should be considered in this situation. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingFrench-language works237,207