Asymmetric vortex pair induces secondary traveling wave vibration of a flexible cylinder from still water to incoming flow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As one of the fundamental problems in fluid mechanics, the flow-induced vibration of a flexible cylinder helps shed light on various complex fluid–structure interaction phenomena, such as the coupling effect of the cross-flow and in-line motions in the relationship between external fluid forces and vortical wake patterns. This paper devised a non-uniform in-flow condition (partially uniform flow and partially still water) for flexible cylinders in experimental and numerical conditions. Consistently, a new phenomenon is observed in different scale experiments and simulations where secondary traveling wave vibration of the flexible cylinder is excited from the still water part to the uniform inflow part due to the positive external fluid energy input in the still water. Furthermore, the detailed flow visualization on the vortical wake patterns around the vibrating flexible cylinders reveals that the external fluid force sources in the still water are due to the existence of the attached vortex pair with an uneven strength, which has been observed before in the still rigid cylinder in the oscillatory flow or the rigid cylinder oscillating in the still water at Keulegan–Carpenter number from 4 to 7.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".