MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200321351 · doi:10.4153/s0008439521001028

A sharpened form of Adams-type inequalities on higher-order Sobolev spaces : a simple approach

2021· article· en· W4200321351 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lu Chen, Guozhen Lu, Maocun Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Mathematical Bulletin · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNonlinear Partial Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsNabla symbolSobolev spaceCombinatoricsOrder (exchange)Type (biology)Sobolev inequalityInfimum and supremumExponentSpace (punctuation)Simple (philosophy)Mathematical analysisPhysicsOmegaQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, we develop an extremely simple method to establish the sharpened Adams-type inequalities on higher-order Sobolev spaces $W^{m,\frac {n}{m}}(\mathbb {R}^n)$ in the entire space $\mathbb {R}^n$ , which can be stated as follows: Given $\Phi \left ( t\right ) =e^{t}-\underset {j=0}{\overset {n-2}{\sum }} \frac {t^{j}}{j!}$ and the Adams sharp constant $\beta _{n,m}$ . Then, $$ \begin{align*}\sup_{\|\nabla^mu\|_{\frac{n}{m}}^{\frac{n}{m}}+\|u\|_{\frac{n}{m}}^{\frac{n}{m}}\leq1}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\Phi\Big(\beta_{n,m} (1+\alpha \|u\|_{\frac{n}{m}}^{\frac{n}{m}} )^{\frac{m}{n-m}}|u|^{\frac{n}{n-m}}\Big)dx<\infty, \end{align*} $$ for any $0<\alpha <1$ . Furthermore, we construct a proper test function sequence to derive the sharpness of the exponent $\alpha $ of the above Adams inequalities. Namely, we will show that if $\alpha \ge 1$ , then the above supremum is infinite. Our argument avoids applying the complicated blow-up analysis often used in the literature to deal with such sharpened inequalities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Mathematical BulletinSame topicNonlinear Partial Differential EquationsFrench-language works237,207