MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200339303 · doi:10.1002/9781119882176.ch14

Augmented Products: The Contribution of Industry 4.0 to Sustainable Consumption

2021· other· en· W4200339303 on OpenAlexaff
Myriam Ertz, Shouheng Sun, Émilie Boily, Gautier Georges Yao Quenum, Kubiat Patrick, Yassine Laghrib, Damien Hallegatte, Julien Bousquet, Imen Latrous

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDigital Transformation in Industry
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet of ThingsIndustry 4.0Computer scienceBig dataProduct (mathematics)Consumption (sociology)Manufacturing engineeringEngineeringComputer securityEmbedded systemData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter presents the main features and functions of the different technologies related to Industry 4.0. It highlights the opportunities that these technologies present for extending the life cycles of products, whether through improved product design, better access to the product, maintenance, redistribution or reclamation. The chapter also presents a crossover between the literature on Industry 4.0 and on extending the life spans of products (sustainable consumption). The Internet of Things (IoT) transforms autonomous products, such as a table, refrigerator or microwave, into smart products that are connected. The IoT includes remote control and self-monitoring. Artificial intelligence (AI) integrates the production of Big Data via the IoT and various data analysis methods can be applied to such data. The IoT, Big Data and AI are strongly interconnected in reciprocal relationships, while additive manufacturing is at the heart of this process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Transformation in IndustryFrench-language works237,207