MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200357589 · doi:10.5040/9781501359545

Apparel Quality

2021· book· en· W4200357589 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Janace E. Bubonia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTextile materials and evaluations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClothingProduct (mathematics)Quality (philosophy)PurchasingMarketingBusinessTest (biology)Production (economics)Sample (material)SyllabusEngineeringAdvertisingOperations managementPsychologyPolitical scienceMathematicsEconomicsMathematics education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<JATS1:p>Apparel Quality: A Guide to Evaluating Sewn Products, Second Edition is a user-friendly guide for evaluating apparel quality to ensure quality products that meet customer expectations. This book provides an overview of apparel production, emphasizing quality characteristics and cues, consumer influences, and motivations impacting purchasing decisions, and highlights the roles of product designers, manufacturers, merchandisers, testing laboratories, and retailers from product inception through the sale of goods. The text is highly illustrated to provide students with the tools needed to evaluate and critique quality elements in apparel and textile products skillfully.</JATS1:p> <JATS1:p>New to this Edition:</JATS1:p> <JATS1:p>- New fabric technology including e-textiles, sew bots, and automation</JATS1:p> <JATS1:p>- International common size equivalents to accompany U.S. size classifications by sex, height, and age</JATS1:p> <JATS1:p>- Sustainability considerations for raw materials, design development, and apparel production</JATS1:p> <JATS1:p>- Expanded international labeling and safety regulations and compliance for the United States, Canada, EU, and Japan</JATS1:p> <JATS1:p>Instructor Resources</JATS1:p> <JATS1:p>- The Instructor's Guide provides suggestions for planning the course and using the text in the classroom, including sample syllabi, in-class activities, lab activities, and projects.</JATS1:p> <JATS1:p>- The Test Bank includes sample test questions for each chapter</JATS1:p> <JATS1:p>- PowerPoint® presentations include images from the book and provide a framework for lecture and discussion</JATS1:p> <JATS1:p>Instructor's Resources may be accessed through Bloomsbury Fashion Central (www.BloomsburyFashionCentral.com).</JATS1:p> <JATS1:p>STUDIO Features:</JATS1:p> <JATS1:p>- Study smarter with self-quizzes featuring scored results and personalized study tips</JATS1:p> <JATS1:p>- Review concepts with flashcards of essential vocabulary and image identification</JATS1:p> <JATS1:p>- Watch videos that take you behind the scenes of factories and testing facilities, to see how concepts covered in the text are applied in the real world</JATS1:p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1180.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTextile materials and evaluationsFrench-language works237,207