MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200366261 · doi:10.35972/kindai.v17i2.646

ANALISIS BISNIS DIGITAL (SKEMA PONZI DAN SKEMA PIRAMIDA) DI ERA REVOLUSI INDUSTRI 4.0 BAGI MASYARAKAT DI KABUPATEN KOTABARU BERDASARKAN UU NO. 8 TAHUN 1995 TENTANG PASAR MODAL DAN UU NO. 7 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG PERDAGANGAN

2021· article· en· W4200366261 on OpenAlexaff
Grenada Floren

Bibliographic record

VenueKINDAI · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesBusiness administrationPolitical scienceEconomyBusinessLawManagementArtEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: The ignorance of the people, especially those living in Kotabaru Regency regarding the existence and implementation of Law no. 08 of 1995 concerning the capital market and Law no. 7 of 2014 concerning trade, is used by illegal business actors to implement Ponzi schemes, pyramid schemes and insider trading on the businesses they offer. This study aims to find out about the development of digital business in the industrial revolution era, the implementation of Law no. 8 of 1995 concerning the capital market and Law no. 7 of 2014 concerning Trade in digital business, providing knowledge in choosing the right and appropriate digital business products. The sampling technique used was Quota sampling which was carried out on 50 respondents spread over 6 Districts in Kotabaru Regency. The qualitative descriptive analysis technique uses the scoring results from the questionnaire, for the results of the questionnaire with negative indications, further observations are carried out using purposive/judgmental techniques. From the results of the research, it was found that there are still many people who are entangled in illegal businesses.
 Keywords: Ponzi Scheme, Pyramid Scheme, Law No. 8 of 1995 concerning Markets Capital and Law no. 7 of 2014 concerning Trade
 
 Abstrak : Ketidaktauan masyarakat khususnya yang tinggal di Kabupaten Kotabaru mengenai keberadaan dan pengimplementasian UU No. 08 Tahun 1995 tentang pasar modal dan UU No. 7 Tahun 2014 tentang perdagangan, dimanfaatkan oleh oknum pelaku bisnis ilegal untuk menerapkan skema Ponzi, skema piramida dan insider trading pada bisnis yang mereka tawarkan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui mengenai perkembangan bisnis digital pada era revolusi industri, implementasi UU No. 8 Tahun 1995 Tentang pasar modal dan UU No. 7 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perdagangan pada bisnis digital, memberikan pengetahuan dalam memilih produk bisnis digital tepat dan sesuai. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan Quota sampling yang dilakukan pada 50 orang responden yang tersebar pada 6 Kecamatan di Kabupaten Kotabaru. Teknik analisis deskriptif kualitatif menggunakan hasil skoring dari kusioner, untuk hasil kuisioner berindikasi negatife di lakukan pengamatan lanjutan menggunakan teknik purposive/judgmental. Dari hasil penelitan di temukan masih banyak masyarakat yang terjerat dalam bisnis ilegal.
 
 Kata Kunci : Skema Ponzi, Skema Piramida, UU No.8 Tahun 1995 Tentang Pasar Modal dan UU No. 7 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perdagangan

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKINDAISame topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207