MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200377381 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1208

1014. Effect of Levofloxaclin and Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole on Planktonic and Biofilm Cells of <i>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</i> Isolates Obtained from Blood and Respiratory Samples

2021· article· en· W4200377381 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
José Mauricio Del Río-Chacón, Fabián Rojas‐Larios, Verónica Villarreal-Salazar, Paola Bocanegra Ibarías, Oscar Alberto Newton-Sánchez, Adrián Camacho-Ortíz, Samantha Flores-Treviño

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInfections and bacterial resistance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStenotrophomonas maltophiliaBiofilmMicrobiologySulfamethoxazoleLevofloxacinTrimethoprimMedicineAntibioticsAntimicrobialBacteriaBiologyPseudomonas aeruginosa

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a non-fermenting Gram-negative pathogen, which causes healthcare-associated infections and exhibits increasing drug resistance rates. In this study, we compared the effect of levofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole on planktonic and biofilm cells of S. maltophilia isolates obtained from blood and respiratory samples. Methods S. maltophilia isolates were recollected from patients older than 18 years from 2018-2020 from Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez, a tertiary care hospital from Nuevo Leon, Mexico. Bacteria were dentified by MALDI-TOF MS. Biofilm formation was determined using the crystal violet staining method.Antimicrobial susceptibility in planktonic cells and biofilm cells were determined by the broth microdilution and the Calgary device, respectively. Results During the 3-year study period, 44 S. maltophilia isolates were identified, 28.8% of which were biofilm producers. Of those, 69.2% were obtained from blood cultures. Isolates were obtained from several wards: 25% infectious diseases ward, 18% nephrology, 18% intensive care units, 14% geriatric ward, 7% plastic surgery, and 18% from other wards. The majority of the studied subjects were men (34.6%), and the mean age was 41 years. The majority of the isolates were susceptible to levofloxacin (94.1%) and to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (76.4%) in planktonic assays. All the isolates were resistant to both antibiotics when analyzing biofilm cells. Levofloxacin resistance was at least four-fold higher in biofilm cells compared to planktonic cells. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance was at least ten-fold higher in biofilm cells compared to planktonic cells. Conclusion The majority of S. maltophilia clinical isolates causing blood infections in a hospital in Mexico were able to produce biofilm. The production of biofilm in S. maltophilia strains enhanced resistance to levofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicInfections and bacterial resistanceFrench-language works237,207