MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200379562 · doi:10.1002/jha2.286

Transverse myelitis after anti‐CD19 directed CAR T cell therapy for relapsed large B cell lymphoma

2021· article· en· W4200379562 on OpenAlexaffabout
Semira Sheikh, Sepideh Mokhtari, Jeffrey A. Silverman, Kayla Reid, Rawan Faramand, Marco L. Davila, Norman Franke, Frederick L. Locke, Michael D. Jain, Daniel Wong, John Kuruvilla

Bibliographic record

VenueeJHaem · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreNorth York General HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVincristineCytokine release syndromeRituximabInternal medicineLymphomaOncologyGastroenterologyCyclophosphamideSurgeryChimeric antigen receptorChemotherapyImmunotherapyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has transformed the care of patients with relapsed/refractory large B cell lymphoma and is associated with unique toxicities, in particular cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity/immune effector cell-associated encephalopathy syndrome (ICANS) [1-3]. The pathophysiology of neurotoxicity with CAR T cell therapy is not well understood, and a spectrum of presentations is increasingly recognized. Here we report the case of a patient who developed transverse myelitis after receiving CAR T cell therapy. A 28-year old woman with refractory primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma was referred for standard of care (SOC) CAR T cell therapy after receiving R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) chemotherapy, radiation, and GDP (gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin) salvage chemotherapy. Due to tumor burden with extensive abdominal involvement, she received bridging therapy with pembrolizumab, dexamethasone, and radiation to the right kidney (see treatment summary, Figure 1A). During lymphodepletion, the patient developed high fevers of up to 40°C, with groundglass opacities on the CT thorax. No infectious etiology was determined; full septic workup, bronchoscopy, and COVID19 testing were negative. The patient proceeded with Axi-cel infusion. Baseline inflammatory markers on D 0 were elevated (Table 1, panel A). From D+1 to D+4, the patient continued to spike fevers >38°C, attributed to Grade 1 CRS (American society for transplantation and cellular therapy criteria). On D+4, the patient became nonverbal, unable to answer questions or follow commands, with myoclonic jerks but no focal motor or sensory symptoms. Her immune effector cell associated encephalopathy score was 0/10 (Grade 4 ICANS). Grade 4 hepatotoxicity (CTCAE v5.0) developed on D+5 (Figure 1B). There were no acute findings on brain MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), and an EEG showed generalized rhythmic delta activity with intermittent generalized periodic discharges; an extremely elevated protein level on lumbar puncture (LP) was consistent with neurotoxicity (Table 1, panel B). The patient received tocilizumab x 1 on D+4 and a dexamethasone taper to D+18 (Figure 1B). Fever and hepatotoxicity resolved from D+5; her neurological status returned to baseline on D+13. At routine outpatient follow-up on D+27, the patient reported ascending paresthesiae to the chest area. Neurological examination showed hyperreflexia, diminished sensation to pinprick, vibration, and temperature in both lower extremities, impaired proprioception in the toes, and unsteady gait; there was no motor weakness. Small bilateral subdural collections thought to be subacute in the setting of a chronically low platelet count were demonstrated on MRI brain, but, otherwise, there were no acute changes. MRI of the spine showed a subtle signal abnormality from T1–T7 within the dorsal central cord, concerning for transverse myelitis. A D+30 response assessment PET scan demonstrated a complete metabolic response from lymphoma (Figure 3). The patient received treatment with steroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for presumed transverse myelitis but returned on D+33 with worsening ascending numbness, bilateral leg weakness, and urinary retention (Figure 1). On examination, there was a T4 sensory level to pinprick, bilateral leg weakness (4/5 in a pyramidal distribution), and extensor plantar responses. MRI of the spine showed an abnormal signal in the cord from T1–T7, in keeping with transverse myelitis (Figure 2). Pulsed IV steroid was given; the patient was discharged on a prednisone tapering schedule but returned on D+49 with paraplegia. Repeat LP was unremarkable (Table 1, panel B), and MRI of the spine demonstrated persistent and increased abnormal signal intensity in the central cord and posterior columns, unchanged in size. An extensive workup for autoimmune and infectious causes of transverse myelitis was negative (Table 1, panel C). The patient received further steroid therapy and plasma exchange (PLEX), with no significant improvement in symptoms. Follow-up MRI (D+65) showed progression of myelitis with extension of signal change from C7 to T7 with enhancement. Further steroid therapy with a slow taper and IVIG were given. Over the next 4 months, the patient regained some motor strength in the lower limbs (2/5 hip flexion, 4/5 plantar flexion) and reported improvement in sensory symptoms (pinprick sensation to the level of the hips bilaterally). Follow-up imaging of the spine on D+208 showed significant improvement in cord signal change from T1 - T6 with resolution of enhancement (Figure 2). A positron emission tomography (PET) scan on D+104 showed ongoing complete metabolic remission from lymphoma (Deauville score 2). We describe an unusual case of transverse myelitis after treatment with anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy, with a relapsing/remitting course over a 5-month period before stabilization and improvement of symptoms. Treatment with CAR T cells was preceded by the administration of a checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1 due to efficacy in primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma [12]. Checkpoint inhibitor treatment itself can be associated with neurological complications but can be combined with CAR T cell therapy with a manageable safety profile [13-15]. Neurotoxicity following CAR T cell therapy is common but usually self-limited and reversible. Pivotal studies of CAR T cell therapy in lymphoma reported ICANS Grade ≥3 in 10–28% of patients, although grading schemes have differed [1-3]. A biphasic pattern has been described, with the first phase often occurring in the context of CRS, and a second delayed phase of presentation in approximately 10% of patients [4-7]. Clinical manifestations of neurotoxicity can vary widely, ranging from headache to encephalopathy, seizures, and cerebral edema. Atypical presentations, including acute leukoencephalopathy and transverse myelitis, have also been reported [8, 16]. The pathophysiology driving neurotoxicity is not well understood. Several reports have implicated endothelial activation and blood–brain–barrier (BBB) disruption which may facilitate the influx of cytokines, recruitment of monocytes, and activation of macrophages, but elevated levels of the excitatory N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor agonists glutamate and quinolinic acid have also been described [6, 9, 17]. Risk factors associated with the development of neurotoxicity include patient-related factors such as younger age, higher tumor burden, and a history of early and/or high-grade CRS, as well as product-related characteristics such as CAR design and choice of lymphodepletion regimen [2, 5, 6]. Our patient presented with multiple risk factors including young age, extensive tumor burden at relapse, and she received a CD28-costimulated CAR T cell product [10]. She had a particularly high baseline ANG2 (Table 1, panel A), known to be associated with increased endothelial cell activation and posited to represent BBB permeability [9]. An association between baseline IL-6, ANG2, ANG2/ANG1, and ferritin, with subsequent severe neurotoxicity after CAR T cell therapy has been described [11]. Indeed, this patient developed evidence of severe BBB permeability after CAR T infusion with a high cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein level on D+5. One limitation of this case report is that in the SOC setting CAR T cells are not routinely quantified or phenotyped, and, therefore, we could not determine if there were any CAR T cell characteristics that differed in this case, and neither was it possible to determine the presence of CAR T cells in the CSF. The patients who developed leukoencephalopathy in the case report from ZUMA-1, for example, were found to have a massive expansion of peripheral CAR T cells and prominent features of BBB disruption [8]. Interestingly, it is also unclear whether any of the treatments pursued (pulsed corticosteroids, PLEX, IVIG) changed the disease course or whether time alone leads to disease improvement in such cases. Rituximab was not administered as CD19 CAR T cell therapy strongly depletes B cells, and additional B cell depletion was considered unlikely to be of benefit. As a relatively new technology, rare and unexpected side effects may occur in patients receiving CAR T cell therapy. Reporting and collection of such cases will help to increase awareness of rare presentations and advance the expertise in managing these challenging cases. We thank the patient, her caregivers, and the health care providers. SS, SM, JAS, KR, NF, DW: No disclosures. RF: Research funding from Novartis and Kite. MLD: Research funding from Celgene, Novartis, Kite, and Atara; other financial support from Novartis, Precision Biosciences, Celyad, Bellicum, and GlaxoSmithKline; stock options from Precision Biosciences, Adaptive Biotechnologies, and Anixa Biosciences. FLL: Scientific advisory role with Kite, a Gilead Company, Novartis, Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, GammaDelta Therapeutics, Wugen, Amgen, Calibr, and Allogene; consultant with grant options for Cellular Biomedicine Group, Inc.; research support from Kite, a Gilead Company. MDJ: Consultancy/advisory role for Kite/Gilead, Novartis, Takeda, and BMS. JGK: Consultant or advisory role for Abbvie, BMS, Gilead, Karyopharm, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics; honoraria from Amgen, Antengene, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen, Karyopharm, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seattle Genetics, TG Therapeutics; research funding from Canadian Cancer Society, Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Canada, Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation, Janssen, Roche, Astra Zeneca; other remuneration from Karyopharm (DSMB). KR and RF performed cytokine and data analyses and reviewed the manuscript; JAS, MLD, NF, and FLL critically reviewed and edited the manuscript; SS, MDJ, DW, and JGK analyzed data and wrote and edited the manuscript.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeJHaemSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207