MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Automated Detection of COVID-19 Cases using Recent Deep Convolutional Neural Networks and CT images

2021· article· en· W4200387391 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Chetoui, Moulay A. Akhloufi

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Computer scienceDeep learningArtificial intelligencePneumoniaMedical imagingFeature extractionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Pattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionDiseaseMachine learningMedicinePathologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

COVID-19 is an acute severe respiratory disease caused by a novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. After its first appearance in Wuhan (China), it spread rapidly across the world and became a pandemic. It had a devastating effect on everyday life, public health, and the world economy. The use of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) techniques combined with radiological imaging can be helpful in speeding-up the detection of this disease. In this study, we propose the development of recent deep learning models for automatic COVID-19 detection using computed tomography (CT) images. The proposed models are fine-tuned and optimized to provide accurate results for multiclass classification of COVID-19 vs. Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) vs. Normal cases. Tests were conducted both at the image and patient-level and show that the proposed algorithms achieve very high scores. In addition, an explainability algorithm was developed to help visualize the symptoms of the disease detected by the best performing deep model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC)Same topicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIFrench-language works237,207