Safety and Feasibility of Reconstructing Dissection Tandem Lesions with Flow Diverter Stents during Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Multicenter Retrospective Case Series
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion may present with concomitant carotid dissections that make the technical approach for their treatment challenging. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of flow diverter (FD) stents to treat carotid artery dissections in tandem lesions of acute ischemic stroke patients during mechanical thrombectomy. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients in which a carotid artery dissection was treated with an FD during endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke between 2018 and 2020 was conducted in 5 high-volume Comprehensive Stroke Centers. Patient clinical and angiographical characteristics, postoperative outcome, and follow-up were recorded. Results: A total of 12 patients (mean age: 54.18±14.74 years, median Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score: 10 [interquartile range 9-10]) were included. Successful FD stenting with immediate patency of the dissected segments and successful intracranial recanalization modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score 2b-3 after thrombectomy was achieved in all patients. A good outcome (modified Rankin scale 0-2 at 90 days) was achieved in 66% (8/12) of patients. In 25% (3/12) of patients, an additional self-expanding carotid stent was used to anchor the FD proximally at the carotid bulb level. Complications included 1 symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after procedure (24-48 hours) and 2 in-stent stenoses at follow-up. Conclusions: In this small case series, the treatment of carotid artery dissection with FD stents was safe and technically feasible during mechanical thrombectomy of acute ischemic stroke patients with tandem lesions and resulted in a high rate of good clinical outcome. These results may provide the basis for designing larger prospective studies to assess the efficacy and safety of FD stents in selected patients with carotid tandem lesions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".