Paediatric anterior larynx: presentations, associations and a review of the literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The literature on the entity of the anterior larynx (AL) is restricted to little evidence on the difficulty encountered in exposing the larynx for intubation, perioperative morbidity and mortality, and scant reports on its prevalence in general adults and children. Here, we describe the prevalence of AL in a series of children presenting with aerodigestive symptoms and explore its association with functional abnormalities, congenital and structural anomalies or conditions. SETTING: Tertiary paediatric centre. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study. Using a prospectively collected surgical database, we identified patients diagnosed with AL (Grades IIb-III-IV Modified Cormack-Lehane scale) and sex and age-matched controls who had undergone full airway endoscopy for aerodigestive symptoms. We collected the demographics, presentations, associated diagnoses and investigations. We compared the proportion of patients with large airway abnormalities and dysmorphism and estimated the prevalence of AL. RESULTS: Over a 5.5-year period, 58 children with AL (28 females, mean age 0.38 years) were matched with 58 controls (mean age 0.42 years). Although both groups presented with permutations of stridor, respiratory failure, cyanotic spells, swallowing and feeding difficulties and SDB, AL presented much more with swallowing and feeding problems (33 vs. 20, p < .05). There were significantly more children with dysmorphism in the AL group (29 vs. 9, p < .05). The prevalence of AL was 4.9% (SE 0.0063). CONCLUSIONS: AL was detected in 4.9% of a sample of children who had undergone airway examination for aerodigestive symptoms. It is significantly associated with dysmorphism, and swallowing difficulties that warrant instrumental evaluation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".