MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200394438 · doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.178

Analysis Socioeconomic Influence on the Utilization of Health Service in the Inpatient Room of Faisal Islamic Hospital Makassar

2021· article· en· W4200394438 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Muhammad Alwy Arifin, Amaliah Amriani AS, Muh. Yusri Abadi, Anwar Mallongi, Dian Saputra Marzuk

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Criminology and Sociology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Quality and Satisfaction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslamNonprobability samplingProbit modelSocioeconomic statusLogitLogistic regressionBusinessSocioeconomicsPopulationMedicineEnvironmental healthGeographySociologyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hospitals in carrying out their role cannot be separated from problems, both from within and from outside that can interfere with the mechanism of work of the hospital in providing health services for the community. Faisal Islamic Hospital Makassar is one of the private hospitals in the city of Makassar which in the last 3 years has decreased the value of BOR. The purpose of this study was to find out the socio-economic influence on the utilization of health services in the inpatient room of Faisal Islamic Hospital Makassar. This research is a cross-sectional study. A total of 99 people were sampled in the inpatient room of Faisal Islamic Hospital Makassar by taking a sample using the purposive sampling method. Data is collected by conducting interviews with respondents. Data processing is done by frequency distribution analysis and univariate and multivariate analysis with the Binary Regression approach namely logit and probit analysis. Based on the results of the study, it was obtained that socioeconomic variables that have an influence on the utilization of health services in the Faisal Islamic Hospital Makassar is the ownership of health insurance with the results of p-value< 0.1 is logit 0.299 and probit of 0.000. For the government to evaluate the ownership of health insurance, because there are still respondents who do not have health insurance where this is not in accordance with the objectives of the National Health Insurance program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Criminology and SociologySame topicHealthcare Quality and SatisfactionFrench-language works237,207