MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200409484 · doi:10.30978/unj2021-3-54

Corelation of gait parameters, cognitive impairment and brain atrophy in patients with Parkinson’s disease and the «normally aging population»

2021· article· en· W4200409484 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P. Y. Diachenko, I. I. Leta, G.S. Moskovko

Bibliographic record

VenueUkrainian Neurological Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTechnology and Human Factors in Education and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGaitAtrophyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationCognitionPopulationRating scaleMedicineParkinson's diseaseGait analysisCognitive declinePsychologyPhysical therapyDiseaseInternal medicineDementiaPsychiatryDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective — to identify the most significant markers of gait that indicate a decrease in cognitive function based on investigation of the corelation of cognitive impairment, gait parameters and atrophy of brain structures in groups of patients with Parkinson’s disease and the «normally aging population».
 Methods and subjects. 66 subjects were examined: 30 patients with Parkinson’s disease (mean age 54.9 ± 5.9, 50 % men) and 33 without neurological pathology (mean age 52.7 ± 7.6, 66 % men). All of them underwent neurological examination, assessment of temporal and spatial gait parameters using the GaitRite system, grading of brain atrophy using a comprehensive visual rating scale of MRI scans and assessment of cognitive status using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale.
 Results. Cognitive performance was significantly lower in the subgroup of patients with Parkinson’s disease compared to the subgroup of «normally aging population». The gait profile of patients with Parkinson’s disease significantly differed from the gait profile of individuals from the «normal aging» subgroup by slower gait velocity, shorter step length and stride length for both limbs. The gait parameters, which showed a strong correlation with cognitive tests, differed in the subgroups, but gait velocity, stride length and step length for both extremities were common among them. These common gait parameters showed a strong direct correlation with brain atrophy in the subgroup of patients with Parkinson’s disease, but only velocity correlated with atrophy in the subgroup of «normal aging» among all of them. It was determined by the method of multiple regression analysis that it was precisely the atrophy of the brain that turned out to be the most influential factor in the decrease in cognitive function in the general group and subgroups.
 Conclusions. The gait profile in Parkinson’s disease subgroup is characterized by lower velocity, shorter step length, stride length for both limbs and significantly differs from the subgroup of «normal aging». These changes are a consequence of the influence of the disease on the motor sphere. Velocity showed a strong correlation in both subgroups not only with cognitive abilities, but also with cerebral atrophy. This confirms the hypothesis about the possibility of using gait velocity as a universal sensitive marker for current and longitudinal assessment of cognitive function, especially in clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUkrainian Neurological JournalSame topicTechnology and Human Factors in Education and HealthFrench-language works237,207