Genomic study of a large family with complex neurological phenotype including hearing loss, imbalance and action tremor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neurological disorders are often associated with a variety of symptoms, which can result from the combined action of genetic variants. We conducted a whole-genome analysis of a previously unreported unique multigenerational Dutch-Canadian family with a complex phenotype presenting with a combination of hearing loss, balance issues or action tremor. Ten family members were available for genetic study. The hearing loss and balance problems are explained by a pathogenic p.P51S substitution in COCH, which is a known founder mutation in Dutch and Belgium families affected by non-syndromic progressive sensorineural hearing loss often accompanied by vestibular dysfunction. Notably, p.P51S did not co-segregate with action tremor in our and reported kindreds. In our family, all 5 patients with tremor were carriers of the extremely rare p.R247W substitution in MCM9 (minor allele frequency in European population is 0.00003), which belongs to the top 0.1% of deleterious variants in the human genome. The MCM9 locus has not been previously associated with action tremor and deserves further investigation in future functional and genetic studies of action tremor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".