Planar organization of airway epithelial cell morphology using hydrogel grooves during ciliogenesis fails to induce ciliary alignment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
. In the trachea, the matrix beneath the epithelial lining is composed of collagen fibres that run along the long axis of the airway. Previous studies have shown that grooved topography can induce morphological and cytoskeletal alignment in epithelial cell lines. In the present work we assessed the impact of substrate topography on the organization of primary human tracheal epithelial cells (HTECs) and human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived airway progenitors and the resulting alignment of cilia after maturation of the airway cells under Air-Liquid-Interface (ALI) culture. Grooves with optimized dimensions were imprinted into collagen vitrigel membranes (CVM) to produce gel inserts for ALI culture. Grooved CVM substrates induced cell alignment in HTECs and hiPSC airway progenitors in submerged culture. Further, both cell types were able to terminally differentiate into a multi-ciliated epithelium on both flat and groove CVM substrates. When exposed to ALI conditions, HTECs lost alignment after 14 days. Meanwhile, hiPSC-derived airway progenitors maintained their alignment throughout 31 days of ALI culture. Interestingly, neither initial alignment on the grooves, nor maintained alignment on the grooves induced alignment of cilia basal bodies, an indication of the direction of ciliary beating direction in the airway cells. Planar organization of airway cells during or prior to ciliogenesis therefore does not appear to be a feasible strategy to control cilia organization and subsequent airway epithelial function and additional cues are likely necessary to produce cilia alignment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".