MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200494527 · doi:10.22374/jclrs.v5i1.48

REGIONAL VARIATION IN FLUID RESERVOIR THICKNESS, OXYGEN TRANSMISSIBILITY AND CORNEAL OEDEMA DURING SCLERAL LENS WEAR

2021· article· en· W4200494527 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chukwuemeka Junior Obinwanne, Damian C. Echendu, Isaura Ilorena d’Alva Brito dos Santos, Sharon Onwuka, Osazee Agbonlahor

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Contact lens Research and Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCorneal surgery and disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScleral lensLens (geology)OphthalmologyCorneaSlit lampOptical coherence tomographyOxygen permeabilityTransmissibility (structural dynamics)Materials scienceAnatomyOpticsOxygenChemistryMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To determine if regional variation in post lens fluid reservoir thickness (PLFT) during scleral lens wear leads to regional variation in oxygen transmissibility and corneal edema during 4 hours of non-fenestrated scleral lens wear.Methods: About 20 healthy subjects (mean age, 28.8 ± 4.2 years) were fitted with nonfenestrated rotationally symmetric scleral lenses. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography was used to measure cornea thickness before and after lens wear, PLFT 10 minutes and 4 hours after lens application, and scleral lens thickness (with the scleral lens in situ) 4 hours after scleral lens application. These measurements were limited to the central 6 mm and divided into three zones (central, mid-peripheral, and peripheral zones). In the mid-peripheral and peripheral zones, eight principal meridians were measured, generating 17 measurement points in total. Scleral lens thickness and PLFT measurements were corrected for optical distortions by a series of equations. Oxygen transmissibility was calculated by dividing the scleral lens oxygen permeability by the optically-corrected scleral lens thickness, taking into account the oxygen permeability of saline and fluid reservoir thickness.Results: A significant regional variation in PLFT (F = 12.860, P = 0. 012) was observed after 10 minutes of the lens application, PLFT was thickest and thinnest in the inferotemporal and the superonasal region of the peripheral zones( 322.6 ± 161.8 µm and 153.8 ± 96.4 µm, respectively); however, this variation was not statistically significant at 4 hours of scleral lens wear (F = 4.692; P = 0.073). Despite significant regional variation in oxygen transmissibility (F = 48.472; P = 0.001) and relatively low oxygen transmissibility through the scleral lens, induced corneal edema did not vary significantly in different regions (F = 3.346; P = 0.126). In the central corneal region, the induced corneal edema correlated moderately with PLFT (r = 0.468; P = 0.037) and oxygen transmissibility (r = -0.528; P = 0.017). This relationship was insignificant in the peripheral cornea.Conclusion: The inferotemporal peripheral region had the thickest PLFT and least oxygen transmissibility, and the superonasal region had the vice versa. Despite significant variation in PLFT and oxygen transmissibility initially, in healthy corneas, this variation does not seem to induce statistically significant regional variation in corneal edema. Increased central PLFT and decreased oxygen transmissibility moderately correlate with central corneal edema.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Contact lens Research and ScienceSame topicCorneal surgery and disordersFrench-language works237,207