MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200503599 · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01388-w

Author Correction: Micro-Meta App: an interactive tool for collecting microscopy metadata based on community specifications

2021· erratum· en· W4200503599 on OpenAlexaff
Alessandro Rigano, Shannon Ehmsen, Serkan Utku Öztürk, Joël Ryan, Alexander Balashov, Mathias Hammer, Koray Kırlı, Ulrike Boehm, Claire M. Brown, Karl Bellvé, James J. Chambers, Andrea Cosolo, Robert A. Coleman, Orestis Faklaris, Kevin E. Fogarty, Thomas Guilbert, Anna B. Hamacher, Michelle S. Itano, Daniel P. Keeley, Susanne Kunis, Judith Lacoste, Alex Laude, Y. Willa, Marco Marcello, Paula Montero Llopis, Glyn Nelson, Jaime A. Pimentel, Stefanie Weidtkamp‐Peters, Peter J. Park, B. Alver, David Grünwald, Caterina Strambio‐De‐Castillia

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Methods · 2021
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicResearch Data Management Practices
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institute of General Medical Sciences
KeywordsMetadataComputer scienceMicroscopyWorld Wide WebInformation retrievalComputational biologyBiologyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the version of this article initially published, the affiliation for author Roland Nitschke was incorrectly formulated. The affiliation has been corrected to read “Life Imaging Center and Signalling Research Centres CIBSS and BIOSS, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany” in the online version of the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.110
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.110
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0080.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0810.057

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.288
GPT teacher head0.521
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReproducibility
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature MethodsSame topicResearch Data Management PracticesFrench-language works237,207