Unplanned 30-Day Readmissions after Hyper-CVAD Chemotherapy in Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the rate and causes of re-hospitalization in the first 30 days after Hyper-CVAD chemotherapy in all patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
 Methods: This descriptive, analytical and cross-sectional study was performed on 827 admissions in ALL patients aged 18 years and older with unplanned hospitalization after HyperCVAD chemotherapy in less than 30 days’ post chemotherapy from April 2016 to April 2018 in Hematology and medical oncology department.
 Results: The rate of unplanned re-admission was 9.91% in all patients. Mean follow-up time was 13.77 ± 6.26 months and the mean age of patients was 35.55 ± 14.6 years. Re-admission rate was more frequent in men (65.7%) and most patients were readmitted only once. The mean duration of re-admission was 8.2±4.15 days and most patients were re-admitted after cycles IB, IIIB and IVB of hyper-CVAD chemotherapy. The most common causes of readmission were febrile neutropenia and pancytopenia. Except for significant changes in CBC, no significant changes were observed in other laboratory tests. Urine culture and blood culture were reported positive in 13.6% and 31.57% respectively, and E-coli was the most common organism isolated from cultures.
 Conclusion: We found increased rate of re-admission following hyper-CVAD chemotherapy in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia which was due to side effects of chemotherapy regimen. It seems to be important not only for high rate of mortality and morbidity in patients resulting from this chemotherapy regimen, but also imposing the heavy cost on health system. Therefore, more effective preventive measures are necessary and useful.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".