MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200516355 · doi:10.1002/cjce.24342

Improved <scp> H <sub>2</sub> SO <sub>4</sub> </scp> ‐catalyzed alkylation reaction in a rotating packed bed reactor by adding additives

2021· article· en· W4200516355 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuntao Tian, Sijing Mei, Liang‐Liang Zhang, Guang‐Wen Chu, Bao‐Chang Sun, Adrian C. Fisher, Yong Luo, Hai‐Kui Zou

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKey Technologies Research and Development ProgramNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsIsobutaneAlkylationChemistryOctaneOctane ratingSolubilityButeneCatalysisOrganic chemistryHydrocarbonGasoline2-ButeneChemical engineeringEthylene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The isobutane/butene alkylation process catalyzed by an acid solution is widely used to obtain high octane number gasoline components. However, limited by the mass transfer and mixing of the acid solution and the hydrocarbon liquid–liquid system, the product performance needs to be improved. Here, the alkylation reaction was strengthened by combining the chemical regulation of the reactant system and process intensification. Three homologs of sulphates and two hydrophilic surfactants were used as additives to regulate the properties of the acid solution, and the effect of different additives on isobutane/butene alkylation was investigated in a rotating packed bed. The Hammett acidity and solubility of isobutane in acid solutions with different additives were measured, and their synergistic effects on alkylation performance were explored. Under relatively mild conditions (the reaction at 8°C and an isobutane/butene ratio of 30:1), an excellent alkylate with a research octane number of approximately 99 was obtained, showing good industrial application prospects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicProcess Optimization and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207