Hemorrhagic cholecystitis from isolated gallbladder injury following blunt abdominal trauma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Gallbladder contusion after blunt abdominal trauma is a rare event that presents with diagnostic challenges. There is no clear evidence supporting conservative or surgical management of gallbladder contusion injuries, especially when they present in isolation. Here, we report the first case of an isolated gallbladder contusion injury after blunt abdominal trauma resulting in hemorrhagic cholecystitis that was successfully managed non-operatively. CASE PRESENTATION: A 22-year-old male patient presented with a 3-day history of severe right upper quadrant pain, leukocytosis, and elevated bilirubin after suffering blunt abdominal trauma from being kicked in the abdomen during a soccer game. The patient was evaluated using computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). His imaging findings were consistent with cholecystitis without cholelithiasis. His bloodwork and imaging were initially concerning for choledocholithiasis, but were later determined to be blood products within the common bile duct (CBD). Through conservative management, which included antibiotics, bed rest, and bowel rest, he had complete resolution of symptoms and normalization of bloodwork after four days of admission and remained symptom free at 1-year. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: This case serves to highlight isolated gallbladder contusion as a potential outcome of blunt abdominal trauma. We re-affirm the diagnostic inconsistencies between CT and US in the work-up of cholecystitis and other biliary pathology. Furthermore, we describe the role of non-operative management in the treatment of traumatic cholecystitis, in the absence of gallstones. CONCLUSION: Gallbladder contusion and hemorrhagic cholecystitis after blunt abdominal trauma can be managed with non-operative interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".