The Impact of Social Responsibility on the Market Value for Services Corporations, Service Type as a Marketing Variable
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study aims to know the impact of social responsibility as a cost and also to show the market value of the Jordanian services corporations listed on the Amman Stock Exchange. “Services type” was used as a variable for the relationship rate in this study. The descriptive approach was used and applied to the data of 37 companies during the period from 2012-2019. The researcher also used statistical methods such as the arithmetic mean and standard deviation to describe the study data, and the test of linear regression and correlation analysis, in order to test the study hypotheses. Among the most important results that have been reached, there is an impact of social responsibility as costs and the disclosure of the market value of services companies. The study also showed a modified effect of services type on the relationship between social responsibility disclosure and market value.Based on the preceding, the study recommended expanding the social responsibility disclosure, which helps the company build a strong name as a desirable institution, which enhances the image of the company and the name of the product in the services market and among customers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".