MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200553008 · doi:10.1128/mbio.03273-21

A J Domain Protein Functions as a Histone Chaperone to Maintain Genome Integrity and the Response to DNA Damage in a Human Fungal Pathogen

2021· article· en· W4200553008 on OpenAlexafffund
Linda C. Horianopoulos, Christopher W. J. Lee, Kerstin Schmitt, Oliver Valerius, Guanggan Hu, Mélissa Caza, Gerhard H. Braus, James W. Kronstad

Bibliographic record

VenuemBio · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Infections and Studies
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGovernment of CanadaNational Institutes of HealthDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyDNA damageHistoneDNA repairCell biologyChaperone (clinical)DNA replicationCryptococcus neoformansGeneGeneticsDNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DNA replication, gene expression, and genomic repair all require precise coordination of the many proteins that interact with DNA. This includes the histones as well as their chaperones. In this study, we show that a histone chaperone, Dnj4, is required for genome integrity and for the response to DNA damage. The gene encoding this protein in Cryptococcus neoformans lacks an ortholog in Saccharomyces cerevisiae; however, it is conserved in humans in which its ortholog is essential. Since it is not essential in C. neoformans, we were able to generate deletion mutants to characterize the roles of Dnj4. We also expressed Dnj4 in S. cerevisiae, in which it was able to bind S. cerevisiae histones and interfere with existing histone chaperoning machinery. Therefore, we show a conserved role for Dnj4 in histone chaperoning that suggests that C. neoformans is useful to better understand aspects of this important biological process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemBioSame topicFungal Infections and StudiesFrench-language works237,207