MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4200556448 · doi:10.1002/etc.5252

Sensitivity of a Model Reptile, the Common Snapping Turtle (<i>Chelydra serpentina</i>), to In Ovo Exposure to 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-<i>p</i>-Dioxin and Other Dioxin-Like Chemicals

2021· article· en· W4200556448 on OpenAlexaff
Jon A. Doering, Markus Brinkmann, Maria Lucio, Serena Stoeck, Alex Vien, Stephanie Petersen, Turk Rhen, Paul D. Jones, Markus Hecker, Anthony Schroeder

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Canadian institutionsGlobal Institute for Water SecurityUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChelydraIn ovoTurtle (robot)CongenerToxicityEcotoxicologyAmphibianToxicokineticsBioaccumulationBiologyToxicologyOviparityZoologyEcologyChemistryEnvironmental chemistryInternal medicineFisheryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reptiles represent the least-studied group of vertebrates with regards to ecotoxicology and no empirical toxicity data existed for dioxin-like chemicals (DLCs). This lack of toxicity data represents a significant uncertainty in ecological risk assessments of this taxon. Therefore, the present study assessed early-life sensitivity to select DLCs and developed relative potencies in the common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) as a model reptile. Specifically, survival to hatch and incidence of pathologies were assessed in common snapping turtle exposed in ovo to serial concentrations of the prototypical reference congener 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), and three other DLCs of environmental relevance, namely, 2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorodibenzofuran (PeCDF), 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (TCDF), and 3,3',4,4',5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB 126). In ovo exposure to TCDD, PeCDF, TCDF, and PCB 126 caused a dose-dependent increase in early-life mortality, with median lethal doses (LD50s) of 14.9, 11.8, 29.6, and 185.9 pg/g-egg, respectively. Except for abnormal vasculature development, few pathologies were observed. Based on the measured LD50, common snapping turtle is more sensitive to TCDD in ovo than other species of oviparous vertebrates investigated to date. The potencies of PeCDF, TCDF, and PCB 126 relative to TCDD were 1.3, 0.5, and 0.08, respectively. These relative potencies are within an order of magnitude of World Health Organization (WHO) TCDD-equivalency factors (TEFs) for both mammals and birds supporting these TEFs as relevant for assessing ecological risk to reptiles. The great sensitivity to toxicities of the common snapping turtle, and potentially other species of reptiles, suggests a clear need for further investigation into the ecotoxicology of this taxon. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:175-183. © 2021 SETAC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry→Same topicEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology→French-language works237,207→