MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Real-Time Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability Analysis of Autonomous System With An FPGA

2021· article· en· W4200582041 on OpenAlex
Minh Xuan Bui, Michael Lu, Reza Hojabr, Mo Chen, Arrvindh Shriraman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFormal Methods in Verification
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceReachabilityField-programmable gate arrayCurse of dimensionalityEmbedded systemParallel computingReal-time computingAlgorithmArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) reachability analysis is a powerful technique used to verify the safety of autonomous systems. HJ reachability is ideal for analysing nonlinear systems with disturbances and flexible set representations. A drawback to this approach is that it suffers from the curse of dimensionality, which prevents real-time deployment on safety-critical systems. In this paper, we show that a customized hardware design on an Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) could accelerate 4D grid-based HJ reachability analysis up to 14 times compared to an optimized implementation and 103 times compared to state-of-the-art MATLAB toolboxes on a 16-thread CPU. Because of this, we are able to achieve guaranteed real- time collision avoidance in dynamic environments that abruptly change with a 4D car model by re-solving the HJ partial differential equation (PDE) at a frequency of 4Hz on an FPGA. Our design can overcome the complex data access pattern while taking advantage of the parallel nature of the computations for solving the HJ PDE. The low latency of our computation is consistent, which is crucial for safety-critical systems. The methodology presented here is without loss of generality: it can potentially be applied to different systems dynamics, and more- over, leveraged for higher dimensional systems. We validate our approach in real world collision avoidance experiments with a robot car in a changing environment. We also provide the code of our hardware design and an AWS AFI image.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it