Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Manitoba Oil Museum and Interpretive Centre (MOMIC) is a collection of people who work and live with oil extraction in the southwestern corner of Manitoba; they have met at annual events, share stories and photos, and induct a major oil contributor into the Manitoba Oil Hall of Fame. At first glance, the Manitoba Oil Museum appears to reify the legitimacy of resource extractive processes and valorize the contributions of key members of Manitoba’s oil industry. However, viewing the museum for the way it is enrolled in the place-making of oil in Manitoba as a boundary object can lead to a different conclusion. An examination of a DVD produced by the museum reveals the ways that boundary work engenders inclusion and exclusion of particular knowledge that operates to condition what is possible within the place-making of oil in Manitoba. This paper suggests paying attention to MOMIC as a place-making boundary object creates opportunities to reveal obscured knowledge-making practices, highlighting inherent critique, but also the limits of critique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it