The prospect of using ozone-safe refrigerants with low global warming potential in scroll compressors. Part 1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Montreal Protocol and the Kigali Amendment have determined the need and deadlines of the replacement of hydro fluorinated refrigerants. Substances of natural origin with a low global warming potential are becoming an alternative to hydrofluorocarbons that are being withdrawn from circulation. Such an alternative corrects the vector of development of refrigeration equipment and entails the need to adapt or create new models of equipment taking into account the excellent properties of new refrigerants. However, the consumer’s choice is still based on the efficiency, cost and reliability of the equipment. Having studied the possibility of using new refrigerants, in the fields of using a scroll compressor, from the point of view of the operational properties of substances, we also noted some aspects of the influence of their thermodynamic and thermophysical properties on the working processes and design of compressor elements. Thus, we present a comparative analysis of the practical application and further prospects for the using of refrigerants in a scroll compressor, highlighting the current directions of studying this issue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".