MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4200624480 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10509801.1

Spatial and temporal variability of Atlantic Water in the Arctic from observations

2021· preprint· en· W4200624480 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alice Richards, H. L. Johnson, Camille Lique

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UK
KeywordsHaloclineArcticOcean gyreGeologyAdvectionOceanographyThe arcticArctic dipole anomalyStructural basinArctic sea ice declineClimatologyArctic ice packSalinityGeomorphologyDrift ice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atlantic Water (AW) is the largest reservoir of heat in the Arctic Ocean, isolated from the surface and sea-ice by a strong halocline. In recent years AW shoaling and warming are thought to have had an increased influence on sea-ice in the Eurasian Basin. In this study we analyse 59000 profiles from across the Arctic from the 1970s to 2018 to obtain an observationally-based pan-Arctic picture of the AW layer, and to quantify temporal and spatial trends. The potential temperature maximum of the AW (the AW core) is found to be an easily detectable, and generally effective metric for assessments of AW properties, although its depth is not always a good indicator of the depth of the AW layer. In contrast to the Eurasian Basin, where the AW warms in a pulse-like fashion and has an increased influence on upper ocean heat content, AW heat in the Canadian Basin became more isolated from the surface due to the intensification of the Beaufort Gyre and an influx of Pacific Water. The increase in density of the AW core suggests an increasing interaction between cold dense shelf flows and the AW during its advection, consistent with the enhanced brine rejection expected from decreases in summer sea-ice extent. This process could play an important role in AW cooling west of the Lomonosov Ridge. The differences in AW trends in the Eurasian and Canadian Basins of the Arctic over the period studied suggest that these two regions may evolve differently over the coming decades.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→