MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200635181 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.044012

Navigating stellar wobbles for imaging with the solar gravitational lens

2022· article· en· W4200635181 on OpenAlex
Slava G. Turyshev, Viktor T. Toth

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Canadian institutionsOttawa Public Health
FundersCalifornia Institute of TechnologyJet Propulsion LaboratoryNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsLens (geology)AstronomyGravitationPhysicsAstrophysicsAstrobiologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The solar gravitational lens (SGL) offers unique capabilities for direct high-resolution imaging of faint, distant objects, such as exoplanets. For that purpose, in the near future, a spacecraft carrying a meter-class telescope with a solar coronagraph would be placed in the focal region of the SGL. That region begins at $\ensuremath{\sim}547$ astronomical units from the Sun and occupies the immediate vicinity of the target-specific primary optical axis---the line that connects the center of the target and that of the Sun. Clearly, this axis is not at rest. It undergoes complex motion as the exoplanet orbits its host star, as that star moves with respect to the Sun, and even as the Sun itself moves with respect to the Solar System's barycenter due to the gravitational pull of planets in our Solar System. Although less prominent, other motions exist. An image of an extended object is projected by the SGL into an image plane and moves within that plane, responding to the motion of the optical axis. To sample the image, a telescope must always be on the move, following the projection, with precise knowledge of its own position with respect to the image. We consider the dominant motions that determine the position of the focal line as a function of time. We evaluate the needed navigational capability for the telescope to conduct a multiyear exoplanet imaging mission in the focal region for the SGL. We show that even in a rather conservative case, when an Earth-like exoplanet is in our immediate stellar neighborhood at $\ensuremath{\sim}10$ light years, the motion of the image is characterized by a small total acceleration that is driven primarily by the orbital motion of the exoplanet (its effect on the projected image estimated to be at the level of $\ensuremath{\sim}6\text{ }\text{ }\ensuremath{\mu}{\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}}^{2}$, decreasing inversely with distance to a target) and by the reflex motion of our Sun (target independent, contributing at $\ensuremath{\sim}0.2\text{ }\text{ }\ensuremath{\mu}{\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}}^{2}$). We discuss how the amplified light of the host star allows us to establish a local reference frame that significantly relaxes navigational requirements for the imaging operations. We conclude that the required navigation in the SGL's focal region, although complex, can be accurately modeled, and a $\ensuremath{\sim}10$-year prospective imaging mission is achievable with the already available propulsion technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it