MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205090770 · doi:10.1515/9783839458082-012

10 Take Off: Mobile Perspectives

2021· book-chapter· en· W4205090770 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuetranscript Verlag eBooks · 2021
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicICT Impact and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Take Off: Mobile PerspectivesWith this chapter, we leave the Montreal-based ethnography behind.In the following, we will travel to or return to Jamaica with the women of this study.Here we look into the mobility process itself that raises questions such as "Which preparations occurred before departure?Who needs to be notified before coming home?How was the traveling process itself?".The experience of accompanying the interlocutors on their homeland travels and returns was a multi-layered, yet, holistic process that involved a broad range of before, during and after communication and interconnected dynamics involving various people, anticipation, moving to Jamaica, on-site experiences, going back and post-travel recollections.As Watts and Urry state, "Mobile ethnography involves traveling with people and things, participating in their continual shift through time, place and relations with others" (2008: 867).Here the ethnography again follows the actual course of the fieldwork, which started in the urban environment of Montreal and then took off via plane from Montreal or Toronto to the Jamaican island.Watts and Urry (2008) identify the traveling time as a 'liminal space' between 'here' and 'there' that needs consideration when researching migratory mobility.This liminal space of traveling brings the anticipations to a climax while pre-communications and preparations are silenced or finished.Moving together with the interlocutors enriched the analysis since a broader understanding of their mobility strategies evolved.Instead of just meeting them at specific points in time, I was part of an entire process.The sites I observed and visited resulted in field notes and photographs.The photographs were again relevant for the discussion of the post-travel recollections with the research partners.Anticipation, memories, and expectations constructed before traveling and returning, strongly influence the 'local knowledge', for example in terms of the ways my interlocutors experience Jamaica, its people, and their (extended) families.As we will see post-traveling, individuals then remember only particular events or situations and tend to forget or overlook negative experiences after some time passes by, which results in recurring travels.In this sense, local experiences altogether influence future travel and migratory intentions as well as future anticipation and expectations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it